Structure of mound-building ant settlements (genus <em>Formica</em>) in Kuzokotsky Peninsula (northern Karelia)

Alexander Markov; Alexsey Gilev; Tatyana Putyatina

doi:10.21638/11701/spbu03.2017.205

Authors

Alexander Markov Department of Biological Evolution, Faculty of Biology, M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Vorobjevy Gory, 1/12, Moscow, 119991, Russian Federation; Institute of Psychology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Yaroslavskaya ul., 13/1, Moscow, 129366, Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7113-7181
Alexsey Gilev Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology, Ural Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Eighth Mart, 202, Yekaterinburg, 620144, Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0404-6343
Tatyana Putyatina Department of Biological Evolution, Faculty of Biology, M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Vorobjevy Gory, 1/12, Moscow, 119991, Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9983-5141

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu03.2017.205

Abstract

The spatial distribution of obligate dominant ant species, which includes four species of the genus Formica: F. exsecta, F. lugubris, F. aquilonia and F. uralensis, and differentiation of multispecies settlements has been studied in the eastern Kuzokotsky Peninsula (northern Karelia, Russia). F. exsecta and F. lugubris were present in remote single colonies, groups of two or three nests, single-species complexes of no more than ten nests, or larger multispecies settlements. F. aquilonia formed a small complex within one of the multispecies settlements. The nests of F. uralensis were single. Significant preference of F. exsecta to aggregate with F. lugubris was revealed in two permanent multispecies settlements; such a preference is atypical for these species in other areas. The nests of F. aquilonia were aggregated only with the nests of their own species. Presumably, the settlement of F. lugubris was facilitated by capturing the active nests of F. exsecta. This is confirmed by the reported case of capture of one F. exsecta nest by an adjacent colony of F. lugubris, as well as by similar cases repeatedly described by other authors. The change of the host species did not violate the spatial structure of the settlement. Thus, a unique structure of settlements of obligate dominant ant species with complicated interactions among them has been described in northern Karelia.

Keywords:

Ants, multispecies settlements, obligate dominant, F. exsecta, F. lugubris, F. aquilonia, F. uralensis, Karelia

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Berman, D. I., Alfimov, A. V., Zhigulskaya, Z. A., Leirikh, A. N. 2010. Overwintering and cold-hardiness of ants in the Northeast of Asia. Sofia-Moscow: Pensoft Publishers, 294 pp.

Breslina, I. P. 1987. Rasteniya i vodoplavayuschie ptitsyi morskih ostrovov Kolskoy Subarktiki [Plants and waterfowl of sea islands of the Kola Subarctic region]. Leningrad. 199 pp.

Cherix, D. 1980. A preliminary note about structure, phenology, and diet of a super-colony of Formica lugubris. Insectes Sociaux 27:226–236.

Cherix, D., Werner, P., Catzeflis F. 1980. Organisation spatiale d‘un système polycalique chez Formica (Coptoformica) exsecta Nyl. (Hymenoptera Formicidae). Bulletin de la. Société Entomologique Suisse 53:163–171.

Clark, P. J., Evans, F. C. 1954. Distance to nearest neighbour as as a measure of spatial relationships in population. Ecology 35:445–453. https://doi.org/10.2307/1931034

Czechowski, W., Radchenko, A. 2006. Do permanently mixed colonies of wood ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) really exist? Annales Zoologici 56:667–673. https://doi.org/10.3161/000345406779508598

Czechowski, W., Radchenko, A., Czechowska, W. 2002. The ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) of Poland. Warsaw, Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences. 200 pp.

Dlussky, G. M. 1967. Muravi roda Formica [Ants of the genus Formica]. Moscow, Nauka, 236 pp.

Domisch, T., Finer, L., Jurgensen, M. F. 2005. Red wood ants mound densities in managed boreal forests. Annales Zoologici Fennici 42:277–282.

Frouz, J., Rybnicek, M., Cudlin, P., Chmelikova, E. 2008. Influence of the wood ant, Formica polyctena, on soil nutrient and the spruce tree growth. Journal of Applied Entomology 132:281–284. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439–0418.2008.01285.x

Gorb, S. N., Gorb, E. V. 1999. Effects of ant species composition on seed removal in deciduous forest in eastern Europe. Oikos 84:110–118. https://doi.org/10.2307/3546871

Goryunov, D. N. 2007. Formyi organizatsii poseleniy u muravev Formica exsecta. [Forms of settlement organization in Formica exsecta ants]. Uspekhi Sovrem. Biol. 127:203–208.

Goryunov, D. N. 2011. Territorial strategies in ants. Entomological Review 91:212–220. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0013873811020096

Goryunov, D. N. 2015. Nest-building in ants Formica exsecta (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Entomological Review 95:953. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0013873815080035

Gösswald, K. 1978. Waldameisen-Vermehrung durch Bildung von Ablegern. Waldhygiene 9:1–16.

Hölldobler B., Wilson E. O. 1990. The Ants. Springer, Berlin, 732 pp. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1420–9101.1992.5010169.x

Hölldobler B., Wilson E. O. 2008. The Superorganisms. The Beauty, Elegance and Strangeness of Insect Societies. W. W. Norton, New York. 522 pp. https://doi.org/10.1653/024.092.0324

Kaczmarek W. 1953. Badania nad zespolami mrowek lesnych. Ecol. Pol. 1:69–96.

Karpovich V. N. 1988. Kandalakshskiy zapovednik [Kandalaksha Nature Reserve]. Reserves of the USSR. Reserves of the European Part of the RSFSR. Moscow, Mysl’ I:20–60.

Kilpelainen J., Punttila P., Sundstrom L., Niemela P., Finer L. 2005. Forest stand structure, site type and distribution of ant mound in boreal forests in Finland in the 1950s. Annales Zoologici Fennici 42:243–258.

Otto D. 1962. Die roten Waldameisen. Wittenberg, Germany. 152 S.

Pamilo, P., Chautems D., Cherix D. 1992. Genetic differentiation of disjunct populations of the ants Formica aquilonia and Formica lugubris in Europe. Insectes Sociaux 39:15–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01240528

Pisarski, B. 1982. Structure et organisation des colonies polycaliques de Formica (Coptoformica) exsecta Nyl. Memorabilia Zool. 38:273–280.

Putyatina, T. S. 2011. The behavior of ants of different species during joint foraging. Entomological Review 87:650—657. https://doi.org/10.1134/S001387381102014X

Reznikova, Z. I. 1983. Mezhvidovyie otnosheniya u muravev [Interspecific relations in ants]. Nauka, Novosibirsk. 206 pp.

Vepsäläinen, K., Savolainen, R. . 1990. The effect of interference by Formicine ants on the foraging of Myrmica. Journal of Animal Ecology 59:643–654. https://doi.org/10.2307/4886

Vital, A. D. 2003. Rastitelnost ostrovov Kuzokotskoy Gubyi [Vegetation of Kuzokotsky Lip islands]. Pp. 41–49 in Works of the MSU White Sea biological station.

Werner, P., F. Catzeflis, and D. Cherix. 1979. A propos du polycalisme chez Formica (Coptoformica) exsecta Nyl., pp. 115–126. In D. Cherix (ed.), Ecologie des insectes sociaux. UIEIS Section française, Laussanne, Switzerland.

Zakharov, A. A. 1977. Adaptatsii semi muravev k usloviyam obitaniya [Adaptations of ant colony to living conditions], pp. 61–81. In M. S. Ghilarov (ed.), Adaptatsii pochvennykh zhivotnykh k usloviyam sredy [Adaptations of soil animals to environmental conditions]. Nauka, Moscow, Russia.

Zakharov, A. A. 1991. Organizatsiya soobschestv u muravev [The organization of ant communities]. Moscow, Nauka. 278 pp.

Zakharov, A. A. 2011a. Monogyny and polygyny in ant-hill life. Russian Entomological Journal 20:341–344.

Zakharov, A. A. 2011b. Muravi: strategiya kontsentratsii naseleniya [Ants: the strategy of population concentration]. Zhurnal Obshchei Biologii 72:269–283.

Zakharov, A. A. 2015. Muravi lesnyih soobschestv, ih zhizn i rol v lesu [Ants of forest communities, their life and role in the forest]. KMK Scientific Press, Moscow. 404 pp.

Zakharov, A. A., G. M. Dlussky, D. N. Goryunov, A. V. Gilev, V. A. Zryanin, E. B. Fedoseeva, E. A. Gorokhovskaya, and A. G. Radchenko. 2013. Monitoring muravev Formika [Monitoring of Formica ants]. KMK Scientific Press, Moscow, Russia. 99 pp.