On the practice of heterogeneity analysis of macrobenthic soft bottom communities (Kandalaksha bay, White Sea)

  • Nadezhda Filippova Saint Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., Saint Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation
  • Nikolay Maximovich Saint Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., Saint Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation
  • Alexandra Guerasimova Saint Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., Saint Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation

Abstract

In 2008 the structure of macrobenthic communities was described at three sites of the White Sea Keret’ archipelago littoral zone. According to the principle of dominance, it is shown that studied sites should be acknowledged as the typical habitats in the White Sea littoral zone for different biocenoses: Macoma balthica + Arenicola marina, Mytilus edulis + Mya arenaria and Zostera marina. The main goal of this work is to estimate a uniform number of replicates for all stations sufficient for achieving the same result of biocenosis differentiation, but using various characteristics for classifi cation of macrobenthos descriptions at stations. The repeated procedures of macrobenthos descriptions comparison based on different numbers of samples (1–10) were performed. It was shown that we can talk about the difference in required number of replicates for different approaches for description of macrobenthic communities. When community descriptions are based only on dominant taxa 3 replicates is quite sufficient. When using classification procedure if the station characteristics represent data on species composition we need 5 and more samples, species biomass — 4 and more samples. The most adequate characteristic of macrobenthos for the classification are standardized biomass values of taxa. Refs 34. Figs 3. Tables 2.

Keywords:

White Sea, littoral, macrobenthos, community, hydrobiological research methods

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Elliott J. M. Statistical analysis of samples of benthic invertebrates. Fresh. Biol. Ass. Sci. Publ., 1971, no. 25, 144 p.

Maksimovich N. V., Pogrebov V. B. Analiz kolichestvennykh gidrobiologicheskikh materialov [Analysis of quantitative hydrobiological materials]. Leningrad: Iz-vo LGU, 1986, 96 p. (In Russian)

Pashkevich M. A., Shuiskii V. F. Ekologicheskii monitoring [Environmental monitoring]. St. Petersburg, Sankt-Peterburgskii gosudarstvennyi gornyi institute, 2002. 75 p. (In Russian)

Shitnikov V. K., Rozenberg G. S., Zinchenko T. D. Kolichestvennaia gidroekologiia: metody sistemnoi identifikatsii [Quantitative hydroecology: methods of system identification]. Tolyatti: IEVB RAN Publ., 2003, 463 p. (In Russian)

Eleftheriou A. Methods for the study of marine benthos. Chichester, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 2013, 477 p.

Bakanov A. I. Nomogramma dlia otsenki neobkhodimogo kolichestva prob bentosa [A nomogram to estimate the required number of benthic samples]. Biologiia vnutrennikh vod: Inform. Bul. [Biology of Inland Waters: information bulletin]. Leningrad, 1978, no. 39, pp. 86–89. (In Russian)

Maksimov V. N., Kuznetsova N. A. Etalon skhodstva: ispol’zovanie pri sravnenii sostava i struktury soobshchestv [Standard of similarity: use the composition and structure when comparing communities]. Moscow, Tovarishchestvo nauchnykh izdanii KMK, 2013. 89 p. (In Russian)

Filippova N. A., Maksimovich N. V. Vliianie rezhima probootbora na rezul'taty klassifi katsii opisanii soobshchestv litoral'nogo makrobentosa [Influence of sampling regime on the results of the classification of the littoral macrobenthic community descriptions]. Materialy “Nauchnoi konferentsii, posviashchennoi 70-letiiu Belomorskoi biologicheskoi stantsii im. N. A. Pertsova (9–10 avgusta 2008)” [Materials of scientific conference devoted to the 70th anniversary of the White Sea Biological Station behalf of N. A. Pertsov (9–10 august 2008)]. Moscow, 2008, pp. 123–126. (In Russian)

Babkov A. I. Kratkaia gidrologicheskaia kharakteristika guby Chupa Belogo moria [A brief hydrological description of the White Sea Chupa Bay]. Ekologicheskie issledovaniia perspektivnykh ob”ektov marikul’tury fauny Belogo moria [Environmental studies of the perspective mariculture fauna of the White Sea]. Leningrad, 1982, pp. 3–17. (In Russian)

Skarlato O. A., Golikov A. N., Gruzov E. N. Vodolaznyi metod gidrobiologicheskikh issledovanii [Diving method of hydrobiological research]. Okeanologiia [Oceanology], 1964, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 707–719. (In Russian)

Fediakov V. V., Naumov A. D. [Automatic method of biocenosis delineation]. Seriia: Trudy Zoologicheskogo instituta “Bentos Belogo moria: populiatsii, biotsenozy, fauna” [Ser.: Proceedings of the Zoological Institute “Benthos of the White Sea: population, biocenosis, fauna”]. Leningrad, ZIN AN SSSR, 1991, vol. 233, pp. 31–34. (In Russian)

Chapman M. G., Underwood A. J. Biological monitoring of macrofauna in artificial units of habitat on intertidal rocky shores in berowra creek. Final report for hornsby shire council. Centre for Research on Ecological Impacts of Coastal Cities. Sydney, 2005. 23 p.

Pesenko Iu. A. Printsipy i metody kolichestvennogo analiza v faunisticheskikh issledovaniyakh [Principles and methods for the quantitative analysis in faunal studies]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1982. 288 p. (In Russian)

Clarke K. R., Warwick R. M. Change in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation. PRIMER-E. Plymouth: Natural Environment Research Council, 2001. 190 p.

Quinn G. P., Keough M. J. Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Ecology and conservation. New York, Cambridge University Press, 2002. 533 p.

Andrew N. L., Mapstone B. D. Sampling and the description of spatial pattern in marine ecology. Oceanogr. and Mar. Biol. Annu. Rev., 1987, vol. 25, pp. 39–90.

Bakanov A. I. Kolichestvennaia otsenka dominirovaniia v ekologicheskikh soobshchestvakh [Quantitative assessment of dominance in ecological communities]. Kolichestvennye metody ekologii i gidrobiologii: sb. nauch. trudov, posviashchennyi pamiati A. I. Bakanova [Quantitative methods of ecology and Hydrobiology (collection of scientific papers dedicated to the memory of A. I. Bakanov)]. Tolyatti, SamNTs RAN Publ., 2005, pp. 37–67. (In Russian)

Vainshtein B. A. O nekotorykh metodakh otsenki skhodstva biotsenozov [Some methods of evaluating similarity of biocenosis]. Zool. Zhurnal [Russian Journal of Zoology], 1967, vol. 46, issue 7, pp. 981–986. (In Russian)

Druzhkov N. V., Makarevich P. R. Metodicheskie rekomendatsii po analizu kolichestvennykh i funktsional’nykh kharakteristik morskikh biotsenozov severnykh morei [Guidelines for the analysis of quantitative and functional characteristics of marine biocenosis of the northern seas]. Apatityi, 1989. 57 p. (In Russian)

Mobius K. A. To biocenosis perspective: oysters and oyster industry (1877). Ostwalds Klassiker. Frankfurt a.M., Verlag Harri Deutsch, 2006, Bd. 268. 204 S. (In German)

Petersen C. G. J. Valuation of the sea II. The animal communities of the sea-bottom and their importance for marine zoogeography. Report of the Danish Biological Station to the Board of Agriculture (Ministry of Fisheries). Copenhagen, 1914, vol. 21, pp. 1–44.

Petersen C. G. J., Boysen-Jensen P. Valuation of the sea. I. Animal life of the sea-bottom, its food and quantity. Report of the Danish Biological Station to the Board of Agriculture (Ministry of Fisheries). Copenhagen, 1911, vol. 20, 81 p.

Vorob’ev V. P. Bentos Azovskogo moria [Benthos of the Sea of Azov]. Trudy AzCherNIRO [Proc. of the AzCherNIRO], 1949, vol. 13, pp. 1–195. (In Russian)

Golikov A. N., Skarlato O. A., Gal’tsova V. V., Menshutkina T. V. Ekosistemy guby Chupa Belogo moria i ikh sezonnaia dinamika [Ecosystems of the White Sea Chupa Bay and their seasonal dynamics]. Biotsenozy guby Chupa Belogo moria i ikh sezonnaia dinamika [Biocenosis of the White Sea Chupa Bay and their seasonal dynamics]. Leningrad, Nauka Publ.,1985, pp. 5–83. (In Russian)

Gur’ianova E. F., Zaks I. G., Ushakov P. V. Litoral’ Kol’skogo zaliva. Ch. 1: Opisanie osnovnykh ploshchadok litorali [Littoral of the Kola Bay. P. 1. Description of the main littoral areas]. Trudy Otdeleniia zoologii i fiziologii Leningradskogo obshchestva estestvoispytatelei [Proceedings of the Department of Zoology and Physiology of the Leningrad Society of Naturalists], 1928, vol. 58, issue 2, pp. 89–143. (In Russian)

Gur’ianova E. F., Zaks I. G., Ushakov P. V. Litoral’ Kol’skogo zaliva. Ch. 2: Sravnitel’noe opisanie litorali Kol’skogo zaliva na vsem ego protiazhenii [Littoral of the Kola Bay. P. 2. Comparative description of the Kola Bay littoral along its entire length]. Trudy Otdeleniia zoologii i fiziologii Leningradskogo obshchestva estestvoispytatelei [Proceedings of the Department of Zoology and Physiology of the Leningrad Society of Naturalists], 1929, vol. 59, issue 2, pp. 47–71. (In Russian)

Gur’ianova E. F., Zaks I. G., Ushakov P. V. Litoral’ Kol’skogo zaliva. Ch. 3: Usloviia sushchestvovaniia na litorali Kol’skogo zaliva [Littoral of the Kola Bay. P. 3. The conditions of existence in the intertidal zone of the Kola Bay]. Trudy Otdeleniia zoologii i fiziologii Leningradskogo obshchestva estestvoispytatelei [Proceedings of the Department of Zoology and Physiology of the Leningrad Society of Naturalists], 1930, vol. 60, issue 2, pp. 17–107. (In Russian)

Golicov A. N., Dolgolenko M. A., Maximovich N. V., Scarlato O. A. Some theoretical approaches to marine biogeography. Mar. Ecol. P. S., 1990, vol. 63, pp. 289–301.

Pogrebov V. B. Litoral’ poluzamknutoi akvatorii Belogo moria v usloviiakh raspresneniia. III. Ordinatsiia vidov i gradientnyi analiz [Littoral of semiclosed White Sea in the conditions of freshening. III. Ordination of species and gradient analysis]. Vestn. Leningr. un-ta [Vestnik of Leningrad University. Series 3. Biology], 1988, issue 4, pp. 8–17. (In Russian)

Burkovskii I. V. Strukturno-funktsional’naia organizatsiia i ustoichivost’ morskikh donnykh soobshchestv [Structural and functional organization and sustainability of marine benthic communities]. Moscow, 1992, 208 p. (In Russian)

Gerasimova A. V., Makimovich N. V. Analiz dolgovremennykh izmenenii strukturnykh kharakteristik v poseleniiakh dvustvorchatykh molliuskov (Beloe more) [Analysis of long-term changes in the structural characteristics of the populations of bivalve molluscs (the White Sea)]. Vestn. St. Peterb. un-ta. Ser. 3. Biologiia [Vestnik of Saint-Petersburg University. Series 3. Biology], 2000, issue 2 (11), pp. 24–27. (In Russian)

Gerasimova A. V., Maximovich N. V. Age-size structure of common bivalve mollusc populations in the White Sea: the causes of instability. Hydrobiologia, 2013, vol. 703, pp. 119–137.

Maximovich N. V., Gerasimova A. V. Prolonged monitoring of intertidal settlements of bivalves mollusks (in the White Sea). 31th Eur. Mar. Biol. Symp. St. Petersburg, 1996, p. 90.

Maximovich N. V., Guerasimova A. V. Life history characteristics of the Mya arenaria in the White Sea. Helgol. Mar. Res., 2003, vol. 57, pp. 91–99.
Published
2015-06-29
How to Cite
Filippova, N., Maximovich, N., & Guerasimova, A. (2015). On the practice of heterogeneity analysis of macrobenthic soft bottom communities (Kandalaksha bay, White Sea). Biological Communications, (2), 61–77. Retrieved from https://biocomm.spbu.ru/article/view/861
Section
Full communications