Lateralization in the visual perception of a potential source of danger in free-ranging steppe marmots (Marmota bobak)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu03.2022.205Abstract
A variety of vertebrate species display lateralization of visual perception of threat. However, the vast majority of studies were carried out in the laboratory conditions, and little is known about the relevance of this lateralization for animals in their natural environment. The aim of our work was to study lateralized visual perception of potential threat in the steppe marmot. The asymmetric use of visual fields when reacting to an approaching threat was assessed in two wild populations of marmots. The results showed that marmots predominantly used the right eye for threat monitoring. A significant impact of anthropogenic disturbance was found both within and between the populations. The right-sided preference was reduced in animals inhabiting areas with high degree of anthropogenic disturbance. The eye (left/right) a focal individual used for threat monitoring did not influence its flight initiation distance. Contrary to a previous study, our results do not suggest that the use of a particular eye affects the speed of threat assessment.
Keywords:
functional brain asymmetry, visual lateralization, eye preference, flight initiation distance, Marmota bobak
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Austin, N. P. and Rogers, L. J. 2007. Asymmetry of flight and escape turning responses in horses. Laterality 12(5):464–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576500701495307
Blumstein, D. T., Diaz, A., and Yin, L. 2018. Marmots do not consistently use their left eye to respond to an approaching threat but those that did fled sooner. Current Zoology 64(6):727–731. https://doi.org/10.1093/cz/zoy003
Chivers, D. P., McCormick, M. I., Warren, D. T., Allen, B. J., Ramasamy, R. A., Arvizub, B. K., Glueb, M., and Ferrari, M. C. O. 2017. Competitive superiority versus predation savvy: the two sides of behavioural lateralization. Animal Behaviour 130:9–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2017.05.006
Collins, R. L. 1985. On the inheritance of direction and degree of asymmetry, pp. 41–71 in S. D. Glick (ed.), Cerebral lateralization in nonhuman species. Academic Press, New York. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-2864803.50009-4
Cooper, W. E. Jr. and Blumstein, D. T. 2015. Escape behavior: importance, scope, and variables, pp. 3–12 in W. E. Jr. Cooper, D. T. Blumstein (eds), Escaping from predators: an integrative view of escape decisions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Cooper, W. E. Jr., Blumstein, D. T. 2015. Escape behavior: importance, scope, and variables, pp. 3–12 in W. E. Jr. Cooper, D. T. Blumstein (eds), Escaping from predators: an integrative view of escape decisions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Ferrari, M. C. O., McCormick, M. I., Allan, B. J. M., Choi, R. B., Ramasamy, R. A., and Chivers, D. P. 2015. The effect of background risk on behavioural lateralization in a coral reef fish. Functional Ecology 29(12):1553–1559. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12483
Forrester, G. S. and Todd, B. K. 2018. A comparative perspective on lateral biases and social behavior, pp. 377–403 in G. S. Forrester, W. D. Hopkins, K. Hudry, A. Lindell (eds), Progress in brain research. vol. 238. Cerebral lateralization and cognition: evolutionary and developmental investigations of behavioral biases. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.pbr.2018.06.014
Frid, A. and Dill, L. M. 2002. Human-caused disturbance stimuli as a form of predation risk. Conservation Ecology 6(1):11. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-00404-060111
Heuts, B. A. 1999. Lateralization of trunk muscle volume, and lateralization of swimming turns of fish responding to external stimuli. Behavioural Processes 47(2):113–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-6357(99)00056-X
Hoffman, A. M., Robakiewicz, P. E., Tuttle, E. M., and Rogers, L. J. 2006. Behavioural lateralization in the Australian magpie (Gymnorhina tibicen). Laterality 11:110–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576500500376674
Hook-Costigan, M. A. and Rogers, L. J. 1998. Lateralized use of the mouth in production of vocalizations by marmosets. Neuropsychologia 36(12):1265–1273. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(98)00037-2
Kim, S., Matyas, F., Lee, S., Acsady, L., and Shin, H. 2012. Lateralization of observational fear learning at the cortical but not thalamic level in mice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 109(38):15497–15501. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1213903109
Koboroff, A., Kaplan, G., and Rogers, L. J. 2008. Hemispheric specialization in Australian magpies (Gymnorhina tibicen) shown as eye preferences during response to a predator. Brain Research Bulletin 76:304–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2008.02.015
Lippolis, G., Westman, W., McAllan, B., and Rogers, L. 2005. Lateralisation of escape responses in the stripe-faced dunnart, Sminthopsis macroura (Dasyuridae: Marsupialia). Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain, and Cognition 10(5):457–470. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576500442000210
Lucon-Xiccato, T., Chivers, D. P., Mitchell, M. D., and Ferrari, M. C. O. 2017. Prenatal exposure to predation affects predator recognition learning via lateralization plasticity. Behavioural Ecology 28(1):253–259. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arw155
Rogers, L. J. 2017. Eye and ear preferences, pp. 79–102 in Rogers L., Vallortigara G. (eds) Lateralized brain functions. Neuromethods, vol. 122. Humana Press, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6725-4_3
Rogers, L. J., Zucca, P., and Vallortigara, G. 2004. Advantages to having a lateralized brain. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 217(6):420–422. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2004.0200
Rogers, L. J. and Kaplan, G. 2006. An eye for a predator: Lateralization in birds, with particular reference to the Australian magpie, pp. 47–57 in Y. Malashichev and W. Deckel (eds), Behavioral and morphological asymmetries in vertebrates. Landes Bioscience.
Romano, D., Benelli, G., and Stefanini, C. 2019. Encoding lateralization of jump kinematics and eye use in a locust via bio-robotic artifacts. Journal of Experimental Biology 222(2):jeb187427. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.187427
Shibasaki, M., Nagumo, S., and Koda, H. 2014. Japanese monkeys (Macaca fuscata) spontaneously associate alarm calls with snakes appearing in the left visual field. Journal of Comparative Psychology 128(3):332–335. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036049
Tsytsulina, K., Zagorodnyuk, I., Formozov, N., and Sheftel, B. 2016. Marmota bobak. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. https://doi.org/10.2305/iucn.uk.2016-3.rlts.t12830a22258375.en
Vallortigara, G. 2000. Comparative neuropsychology of the dual brain: a stroll through animals’ left and right perceptual worlds. Brain Lang 73(2):189–219. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.2000.2303
Vallortigara, G., Chiandetti, C., and Sovrano, V. A. 2011. Brain asymmetry (animal). WIREs Cognitive Science 2(2):146–157. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.100
Zaynagutdinova, E., Karenina, K., and Giljov, A. 2020. Lateralization of vigilance in geese: influence of flock size and distance to the source of disturbance. Biological Communications 65(3):252–261. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu03.2020.305
Downloads
Published
2022-06-24
How to Cite
Demina, I., Dyomin, A., & Karenina, K. (2022). Lateralization in the visual perception of a potential source of danger in free-ranging steppe marmots (<em>Marmota bobak</em>). Biological Communications, 67(2), 120–126. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu03.2022.205
License
Articles of Biological Communications are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.
