On the role of biological factor in soil formation of the taiga zone

  • Inna Archegova Institute of Biology of the Komi Science Centre of the Ural Division RAS, 28 Kommunisticheskaya st., 167982, Syktyvkar, Komi Republic, Russian Federation
  • Andrey Panyukov Institute of Biology of the Komi Science Centre of the Ural Division RAS, 28 Kommunisticheskaya st., 167982, Syktyvkar, Komi Republic, Russian Federation
  • Elena Kuznetsova Institute of Biology of the Komi Science Centre of the Ural Division RAS, 28 Kommunisticheskaya st., 167982, Syktyvkar, Komi Republic, Russian Federation
  • Vera Kovaleva Institute of Biology of the Komi Science Centre of the Ural Division RAS, 28 Kommunisticheskaya st., 167982, Syktyvkar, Komi Republic, Russian Federation

Abstract

Using a sample of soil formation during self-restoration succession at post-technogenic plot in the middle taiga subzone, we have discussed the following questions: soil as an ecosystemic component; main factor and principles of soil formation; resistance mechanism of ecosystem and its components. The studies were conducted at two sample plots which had formed under the same conditions on homogeneous technogenic material during self-restoration succession of perennial grassy and forest (alder) ecosystems. The theoretical approach was based on the principle of systematicity. In accordance with that principle, plant composition, productivity of plant community, microbe complex, composition of water-soluble substances, morphology and chemical characteristics of soils were surveyed. Plant community types were found to be associated with morphological structure and properties of newly-formed soils, as a result of biological factor and biological organic (plant) matter cycle. Complex investigation of soil formation during self-restoration succession of different-type plant communities allowed for identifying soil formation as a formation process of biogenic-accumulative ecosystemic component which ensures stable self-reproduction of plant communities and whole ecosystem. Refs 19. Tables 7.

Keywords:

ecosystem, phytomass transformation, humus, microbe complex, water-soluble substances

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Zonn S. V. Sovremennye problemy genezisa i geografii pochv [Modern problems of the genesis and geography of soils]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1983. 167 р. (In Russian)

Sokolov I. A. Teoreticheskie problemy geneticheskogo pochvovedeniia [Theoretical problems of genetic soil science]. Novosibirsk, Nauka Publ., 1993. 232 р. (In Russian)

Rozhkov V. A. Klassiologiia i klassifikatsiia pochv [Klassiology and soil classification]. Pochvovedenie, 2012, no. 3, pp. 259–269. (In Russian)

Archegova I. B., Fedorovich V. A. O biologicheskoi sushchnosti pochvy (Metodologicheskie problemy pochvovedeniia) [About the biological nature of the soil (methodological problems of Soil Science)]. Syktyvkar, 1988. 36 р. (Series of preprints “Scientific reports”. Komi Scientific Center, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, issue 201). (In Russian)

Archegova I. B., Fedorovich V. A. Metodologicheskie aspekty izucheniia pochv na sovremennom etape [Methodological aspects of the study of soils at the present stage]. Yekaterinburg, 2003. 92 р. (In Russian)

Abakumov E. V., Gagarina E. I. Pochvoobrazovanie v posttekhnogennykh ekosistemakh kar’erov na Severo-Zapade Russkoi ravniny [Soil formation in post-mining ecosystems on the North-West of Russian Plain]. St. Petersburg, St.-Petersburg Univ. Press, 2006. 208 р. (In Russian)

Androkhanov V. A., Ovsyannikova S. V., Kurachev V. M. Tekhnozemy: svoistva, rezhimy, funktsionirovanie [Technozems: properties, regimes, functions]. Novosibirsk, 2000. 200 р. (In Russian)

Klaas G. J. N., van Lagen B., Buurman P. Composition of plant tissues and soil organic matter in the first stages of a vegetation succession. Geoderma, 2001, no. 100, pp. 1–24.

Frouz J. et al. Soil biota and upper soil layer development in two contrasting post-mining chronosequences. Ecolog. Engineer, 2001, vol. 48, pp. 503–517.

Polevaia geobotanika [Field geobotany]. Moscow; Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1964. 532 p. (In Russian)

Cherepanov S. K. Sosudistye rasteniia Rossii i sopredel’nykh gosudarstv [Vascular plants of Russia and neighboring states]. St. Petersburg, Mir i semya-95 Publ., 1995. 992 p. (In Russian)

Rodin L. E., Remezov N. P., Bazilevich N. E. Metodicheskie ukazaniia k izucheniiu dinamiki i biologicheskogo krugovorota v fitotsenozakh [Guidelines to study the dynamics and biological cycle in phytocenoses]. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1967. 145 p. (In Russian)

Teoriia i praktika khimicheskogo analiza pochv [Theory and practice of chemical analysis of soils]. Ed. by L. A. Vorobiova. Moscow, GEOS Publ., 2006. 400 p. (In Russian)

Ponomarova V. V., Plotnikova T. A. Gumus i pochvoobrazovanie (metody i rezul’taty izucheniia) [Humus and soil formation (methods and results of the study)]. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1988. 222 p. (In Russian)

Metody pochvennoi mikrobiologii i biokhimii [Methods of Soil Microbiology and Biochemistry]. Ed. by D. G. Zvyagintsev. Moscow, Moscow Univ. Press, 1991. 304 p. (In Russian)

Domsh K. H., Gams W., Anderson T.-H. Compendium of soil fungi. IHW-Verlag Eching, 2007. 672 p.

Ramirez C. Manual and atlas of the Penicillia. Amsterdam, New York, Oxford, Elsevier Biomedical Press, 1982. 874 p.

Morozova R. M. Mineral’nyi sostav rastenii lesov Karelii [The mineral composition of plants in the forests of Karelia]. Petrozavodsk, 1991. 100 p. (In Russian)

Archegova I. B. Nekotorye aspekty teoreticheskogo opredeleniia pochv [Some aspects of theoretical determination of soil]. Vestnik of Saint-Petersburg University. Series 3. Biology, 2015, issue 1, pp. 98–103. (In Russian)
Published
2016-06-26
How to Cite
Archegova, I., Panyukov, A., Kuznetsova, E., & Kovaleva, V. (2016). On the role of biological factor in soil formation of the taiga zone. Biological Communications, (2), 127–139. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu03.2016.210
Section
Full communications