Pheromonal effects on germ cells of house mouse males: possible evolutionary consequences

Authors

  • Eugene Daev Department of Genetics and Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology, Saint Petersburg State University, Universitetskaya nab., 7–9, Saint Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2036-6790

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu03.2019.207

Abstract

It is well known that in mice some pheromones modify reproductively important features. But the genetic mechanisms underlying such changes remain insufficiently studied. Here we show that in laboratory mice (Mus musculus L.), volatile signal 2,5-dimethylpyrazine excreted by donor stressed females increases the level of structural chromosome aberrations and other meiotic disturbances in spermatocytes of recipient males after nasal contact with the volatiles via sniffing. These chemosignals (i.e. pheromones) also induce abnormalities of sperm heads in the recipient mice. We assume that visible macro-damages at the chromosome level in meiotic cells are marks of a more widely disturbing effect (not only macro- but also micro-damages) of some olfactory signals in meiotic cells. It is most probable that the effects of volatile cues are mediated by the nervous system of the recipient organism. While gross chromosomal aberrations lead mainly to death of damaged cells, some of them (micro-damages of the chromosomes) might reach spermatozoa, and we detected part of them as anomalous sperm heads. Such abnormalities can reduce the fertilizing capacity of sperm. Moreover, some of the mutations induced by density-dependent volatile chemosignals can reach the progeny and influence the quantity and genetic quality of future generations. Possible microevolutionary consequences are discussed.

Keywords:

abnormal sperm heads, chromosome aberrations, house mouse, microevolutionary consequences, pheromones, spermatocytes

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Adler, I. D. 2000. Spermatogenesis and mutagenicity of environmental hazards: extrapolation of genetic risk from mouse to man. Andrologia 32:233–137. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0272.2000.00390.x

Adler, I. D., Pacchierotti, F., and Russo A. 2012. The measurement of induced genetic change in mammalian germ cells. Methods in Molecular Biology 817:335–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-421-6_16

Amer, S. M., Donya, S. M., and Aly, F. A. E. 2003. Genotoxicity of benomyl and its residues in somatic and germ cells of mice fed on treated stored wheat grains. Archives Toxicology 77:712–721. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-003-0464-9

Brennan, P. A. and Keverne, E. B. 2004. Something in the air? New insights into mammalian pheromones. Current Biology 14(2):R81–R89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2003.12.052

Bronson, F. H. and Coquelin, A. 1980. The modulation of reproduction by priming pheromones in house mice: speculation on adaptive function. In Muller-Schwarze, D. and Silverstein, R. M. (eds), Chemical signals — Vertebrates and aquatic invertebrates, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 243–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-1027-3_16

Brook, J. D. and Chandley, A. C. 1986. Testing for the chemical induction of aneuploidy in the male mouse. Mutation research 164:117–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1161(86)90050-6

Bruce, H. M. 1959. An exteroceptive block to pregnancy in the mouse. Nature 184(4680):105. https://doi.org/10.1038/184105a0

Boonstra, R. 2013. The ecology of stress: a marriage of disciplines. Functional Ecology 27:7–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12048

Cannon, W. 1935. Stresses and strains of homeostasis. American Journal of the Medical Science 89:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000441-193501000-00001

Creel, S., Dantzer, B., Goymann, W., and Rubenstein, D. R. 2013. The ecology of stress: effects of the social environment. Functional Ecology 27:66–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2012.02029.x

Daev, E. V. 1983. Action of exogenic metabolites on cytogenetic characteristics of spermatogenesis and reproductive function of house mouse males. PhD thesis, Leningrad State University, Leningrad (Saint-Petersburg), Russia.

Daev, E. V. 1994. Pheromonal regulation of genetic processes: research on the house mouse (Mus musculus L.). Russian Journal of Genetics 30(8):964–970.

Daev, E. V. 2003. Induction of dominant lethals in progeny of CBA male mice after pheromonal action. Russian Journal of Genetics 39(10):1138–1142. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026122926802

Daev, E. V. 2007. Stress, chemocommunication, and the physiological hypothesis of mutation. Russian Journal of Genetics 43(10):1082–1092. https://doi.org/10.1134/S102279540710002X

Daev, E. V. 2010. Genetic Aspects of Stress Neuroendocrinology. In Penkava, N.S, and Haight, L.R. (eds), Neuroendocrinology Research Developments. Nova Science Publishers, Inc., New York, Hauppauge, pp. 119–133.

Daev, E. V. and Dukelskaya, A. V. 2003. The female pheromone 2,5-dimethylpyrazine induces sperm-head abnormalities in male CBA mice. Russian Journal of Genetics 39(7):811–815. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024709321888

Daev, E. V. and Dukelskaya, A. V. 2005. Induction of meiotic disturbances in spermatocytes I by pheromones as an inhibiting mechanism of male reproductive function in house mice. Tsitologiia 47(6):505–509.

Daev, E. V., Surinov, B. P., and Dukelskaya, A. V. 2007. Chemosignaling in CBA and C57Bl/6 mouse strains is modified by stress. Ekologicheskaya Genetika 5(2):37–43. https://doi.org/10.17816/ecogen5237-43

Daev, E. V., Surinov, B. P., and Dukelskaya, A. V. 2008. Post-stress chemosignals affect cells from immunocompetent organs in laboratory mice of three inbred strains. Ekologicheskaya Genetika 6(1):27–33. https://doi.org/10.17816/ecogen6127-33

Daev, E. V., Surinov, B. P., Dukelskaya, A. V., and Marysheva, T. M. 2007a. Chromosomal abnormalities and spleenocyte production in laboratory mouse males after exposure to stress chemosignals. Tsitologiia 49(8):696–701.

Daev, E. V., Tzapigina, R. I., and Lopatina, N. G. 1988. Incidence of dominant lethals in the progeny of young male house mice (Mus musculus L.) after exposure to excretory products of mature males of the same species. Genetika 24(11):2015–2021.

Daev, E. V., Vorob'ev, K. V., Shustova, T. I., Zimina, S. A., and Samotokin, M. B. 2000. Genotype-specific changes in functional parameters of immunocompetent cells in laboratory male mice under conditions of pheromoneal stress. Russian Journal of Genetics 6(8):872–876.

Fugere, V., Andino, P., Espinosa, R., Anthelme, F., Jacobsen, D., and Dangles, O. 2012. Testing the stress-gradient hypothesis with aquatic detritivorous invertebrates: insights for biodiversityecosystem functioning research. Journal of Animal Ecology 81:1259–1267. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2012.01994.x

Gessner, M. O. and Hines, J. 2012. Stress as a modifier of biodiversity effects on ecosystem processes? Journal of Animal Ecology 81:1143–1145. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12011

Glynin, T. S. 2018. Pathways of stabilization and destabilization of bone marrow cell genome under olfactory chemosignals action in mice. PhD thesis in Biology, Saint-Petersubrg State University, Saint-Petersubrg, Russia.

Guzzo, A. C., Jheon, J., Imtiaz, F., and DeCatanzaro, D. 2012. Oestradiol transmission from males to females in the context of the Bruce and Vandenbergh effects in mice (Mus musculus). Reproduction 143(4):539–548. https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-11-0375

Jemiolo, B., and Novotny, M. 1994. Inhibition of sexual maturation in juvenile female and male mice by a chemosignal of female origin. Physiology and Behavior 55(3):519–522. https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9384(94)90110-4

Jha, A. M. and Kumar, M. 2006. In vivo evaluation of induction of abnormal sperm morphology in mice by an unsaturated aldehyde crotonaldehyde. Mutation Research — Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis 603(2):159–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2005.11.010

Kerkis, Y. Y. 1940. Physiologic changes inside cell as a reason of mutation process. Uspehi sovremennoi` biologii 1:344–350.

Koch, S., Kramer, A., Stein, J., Adrian, V., and Weuffen, W. 1989. Investigation of mutagenicity in sperm-head test/mouse and mutagenic potency of 2 disinfectants on the basis of peracetic acid and phenolics. Zentralblatt fur Hygiene und Umweltmedizin 188(5):391–403.

Koyama, S. 2004. Primer effects by conspecific odors in house mice: a new perspective in the study of primer effects on reproductive activities. Hormones and Behavior 46:303–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2004.03.002

Lahdetie, J., Peltonen, K., and Sjoblom, T. 1997. Germ cell mutagenicity of three metabolites of 1,3-butadiene in the rat: induction of spermatid micronuclei by butadiene mono-, di-, and diolepoxides in vivo. Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis 29:230–239. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2280(1997)29:3%3C230::AID-EM2%3E3.0.CO;2-G

Lawton, A. D., and Whitsett J. M. 1979. Inhibition of sexual maturation by a urinary pheromone in male prairie deer mice. Hormones and Behavior 13(2):128–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/0018-506X(79)90052-7

Lobashev, M. E. 1947. Physiological (paranecrotic) hypothesis of the mutation process. Vestnik Leningradskogo universiteta 8:10–29.

Ma, W., Miao, Z., and Novotny, M. V. 1998. Role of the adrenal gland and adrenal-mediated chemosignals in suppression of estrus in the house mouse: The Lee-Boot effect revisited. Biology of Reproduction 5(6):1317–1320. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod59.6.1317

Massey, A. and Vandenbergh, J. G. 1980. Puberty delay by a urinary cue from female house mice in feral populations. Science 209:821–822. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7190728

Massey, A. and Vandenbergh, J. G. 1981. Puberty acceleration by urinary cue from male mice in feral populations. Biology of Reproduction 24:523–527. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod24.3.523

Oakberg, E. F. 1956. Duration of spermatogenesis in the mouse and timing of stages of the cycle of the seminiferous epithelium. American Journal of Anatomy 99(3):507–516. https://doi.org/10.1002/aja.1000990307

Oakberg, E. F. 1957. Duration of spermatogenesis in the mouse. Nature 180:1137–1138. https://doi.org/10.1038/1801137a0

Page, J., Suia, J. A., Santos, J. L., and Rufas, J. S. 1998. Squash procedure for protein immunolocalization in meiotic cells. Chromosome Research 6:639–642. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009209628300

Peele, R., Salazar, I., Mimmack, M., Keverne, E. B., and Brennan, P. A. 2003. Low molecular weight constituents of male mouse urine mediate the pregnancy block effect and convey information about the identity of the mating male. European Journal of Neuroscience 18:622–628. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02790.x

Rajendren, G. and Dominic, C. J. 1988. Effect of cyproterone acetate on the pregnancy-blocking ability of male mice and the possible chemical nature of the pheromone. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 84:387–392. https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0840387

Selye, H. 1936. A syndrome produced by diverse nocuous agents. Nature 138:32. https://doi.org/10.1038/138032a0

Selye, H. 1946. The general adaptation syndrome and the diseases of adaptation. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology 6:117–230. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem-6-2-117

Tirindelli, R., Dibattista, M., Pifferi, S., and Menini, A. 2009. From pheromones to behavior. Physiological Reviews 89:921–956. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00037.2008

Tzapigina, R. I., Daev, E. V., and Novikov, S. N. 1981. The influence of excreted metabolites of house mouse males on a cell division process in germ tissue of young animals after single or multiple exposures. The research in genetics 9:17–23.

Vandenbergh, J. G. 1983. Pheromones and reproduction in mammals. Academic Press Inc., New York.

Wyrobek, A. J. and Bruce, W. R. 1978. The induction sperm-shape abnormalities in mice and humans. In: Hollaender, A. and de Serres, F.J. (eds). Chemicals Mutagen Principles and Methods for their Detectionl 5. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 257–285.

Downloads

Published

2019-08-27

How to Cite

Daev, E. (2019). Pheromonal effects on germ cells of house mouse males: possible evolutionary consequences. Biological Communications, 64(2), 158–165. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu03.2019.207

Issue

Section

Full communications

Most read articles by the same author(s)