Reorientation ability in redtail splitfin (Xenotoca eiseni): role of environmental shape, rearing in group and exposure time

  • Valeria Anna Sovrano Center for Mind/Brain Sciences (CIMeC), University of Trento, Piazza Manifattura 1, Borgo Sacco, I-38068 Rovereto (Trento), Italy; Department of Psychology and Cognitive Sciences, University of Trento, Corso Bettini 84, I-38068, Rovereto (Trento), Italy
  • Cinzia Chiandetti Department of Life Sciences, University of Trieste, Via L. Giorgieri 5, I-34127 Trieste, Italy


When passively disoriented in an enclosed space, animals use the geometry of the environment (angular cues and metrically distinct surfaces) to find a position. Whether the ability to deal with geometry is a mechanism available at birth, with little influence of previous experience with the same kind of information, is still debated. We reared fish (Xenotoca eiseni) in tanks of different shape (circular or rectangular) either singly or in group and tested at different ages (at one week or one, five or ten months). Fish were trained to reorient in an enclosure with a distinctive geometry (a rectangular arena) and a blue wall providing non-geometric, featural information. Then, they were tested after an affine transformation that created conflict between geometric and non-geometric information as learned during training. We found that all fish, since one-week old, use significantly more the geometry of the enclosure for reorientation independently from the experience in circular or rectangular tanks. At one month of age, we observed a modulatory effect of rearing experience during learning with an advantage of individuals reared singly in rectangular cages, but no difference was evident at test. Furthermore, such effect on learning propensity disappeared later in development, i.e., when fish were trained at five or ten months of age. These results confirm that the use of geometric information provided by the shape of an enclosure is spontaneous and inborn, and that a modulatory effect of experience can appear briefly during ontogeny, but experience is not essentially needed to deal with geometry.


Redtail splitfin Xenotoca eiseni, spatial cognition, reorientation, geometric module, experience, rearing


Download data is not yet available.


Batty, E. R., Bloomfield, L. L., Spetch, M. L., and Sturdy, C. B. 2009. Comparing black-capped Poecile atricapillus and mountain chickadees Poecile gambeli: use of geometric and featural information in a spatial orientation task. Animal Cognition 12:633–641.

Bisazza, A., Sovrano, V. A., and Vallortigara, G. 2001. Consistency among different tasks of left-right asymmetries in lines of fish originally selected for opposite direction of lateralization in a detour task. Neuropsychologia 39:1077–1085.

Brown, A. A., Spetch, M. L., and Hurd, P. L. 2007. Growing in circles: Rearing environments alter spatial navigation in fish. Psychological Science 18:569–573.

Caro, T. M., Roper, R., Young, M., and Dank, R. 1979. An inter-observer reliability. Behaviour 69:3–4.

Cheng, K. 1986. A purely geometric module in the rat’s spatial representation. Cognition 23 (2):149–178.

Cheng, K., and Newcombe, N. S. 2005. Is there a geometric module for spatial orientation: squaring theory and evidence. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 12:1–23.

Chiandetti, C., and Vallortigara, G. 2008. Is there an innate geometric module? Effects of experience with angular geometric cues on spatial re-orientation based on the shape of the environment. Animal Cognition 11 (1):139–146.

Chiandetti, C., and Vallortigara, G. 2010. Experience and geometry: controlled-rearing studies with chicks. Animal Cognition 13 (3):463–470.

Chiandetti, C., Spelke, E. S., and Vallortigara, G. 2015. Inexperienced newborn chicks use geometry to spontaneously reorient to an artificial social partner. Developmental Science 18 (6):972–978.

Dehaene, S., Izard, V., Pica, P., and Spelke, E. 2006. Core knowledge of geometry in an Amazonian indigene group. Science 311 (5759): 381–384.

Fitzsimons, J. M. 1972. A revision of two genera of goodeid fishes (Cyprinodontiformes, Osteichthyes) from the Mexican Plateau. Copeia 1972 (4):728–756.

Gouteux, S., Thinus-Blanc, C., and Vauclair, J. 2001. Rhesus monkeys use geometric and nongeometric information during a reorientation task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 130:509–519.

Gray, E. R., Bloomfield, L. L., Ferrey, A., Spetch, M. L., and Sturdy, C. B. 2005. Spatial encoding in mountain chickadees: features overshadow geometry. Biological Letters 1:314–317.

Grossman, L., Stewart, A., Gaikwad, S., Utterback, E., Wu, N., DiLeo, J., Frank, K., Hart, P., Howard, H., and Kalueff, A. V. 2011. Effects of piracetam on behavior and memory in adult zebrafish. Brain Research Bulletin 85:58–63.

Hermer, L., and Spelke, E. 1994. A geometric process for spatial reorientation in young children. Nature 370:57–59.

Izard, V., Pica, P., Spelke, E. S., and Dehaene, S. 2011. Flexible intuitions of Euclidean geometry in an Amazonian indigene group. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108 (24):9782–9787.

Kelly, D. M., Spetch, M. L., and Heth, C. D. 1998. Pigeons’ Columba livia encoding of geometric and featural properties of a spatial environment. Journal of Comparative Psychology 112:259–269.

Lee, S. A., Vallortigara, G., Ruga, V., and Sovrano, V. A. 2012. Independent effects of geometry and landmark in a spontaneous reorentation task: A study of two species of fish. Animal Cognition 12:661–870.

Meyer, M. K., Wischnath, L., and Foerster, W. 1985. Lebendgebärende Zierfishe: Arten der Welt. Mergus Verlag, Melle, Germany.

Reichert, J. F., and Kelly, D. M. 2015. How Clark’s nutcrackers (Nucifraga columbiana) weigh geometric cues depends on their previous experience. Animal Cognition 18 (4):953–968.

Schubert P. 1990. Xenotoca eiseni — ein mexicaner von besonderem Reiz. Aquarien Terrarien 6: 193–195.

Sison, M., and Gerlai, R. 2010. Associative learning in zebrafish (Danio rerio) in the plus maze. Behavioural Brain Research 207 (1):99–104.

Sovrano, V. A., and Bisazza, A. 2008. Recognition of partly occluded objects by fish. Animal Cognition 11:161–166.

Sovrano, V. A., and Bisazza, A. 2009. Perception of subjective contours in fish. Perception 38:579–590.

Sovrano, V. A., Bisazza, A., and Vallortigara, G. 2001. Lateralization of response to social stimuli in fishes: A comparison between different methods and species. Physiology and Behaviour 74:237–244.

Sovrano, V. A., Bisazza, A., and Vallortigara, G. 2002. Modularity and spatial reorientation in a simple mind: Encoding of geometric and nongeometric properties of a spatial environment by fish. Cognition 85:51–59.

Sovrano, V. A., Bisazza, A., and Vallortigara, G. 2003. Modularity as a fish views it: Conjoining geometric and nongeometric information for spatial reorientation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 29:199–210.

Sovrano, V. A., Bisazza, A., and Vallortigara, G. 2005. Animal’s use of landmarks and metric information to reorient: Effects of size of experimental space. Cognition 97:121–133.

Sovrano, V. A., Bisazza, A., and Vallortigara, G. 2007. How fish do geometry in large and small spaces. Animal Cognition 10:47–54.

Sovrano, V. A., Rainoldi, C., Bisazza, A., and Vallortigara, G. 1999. Roots of brain specializations: Preferential left-eye use during mirror-image inspection in six species of teleost fish. Behavioural Brain Research 106:175–180.

Sovrano, V. A., Rigosi, E., and Vallortigara, G. 2012. Spatial reorientation by geometry in bumblebees. Plos One 7 (5):e37449.

Spelke, E. S., and Lee S. A. 2012. Core systems of geometry in animal minds. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. 367:2784–2793.

Stancher, G., Sovrano, V. A., Potrich, D., and Vallortigara, G. 2013. Discrimination of small quantities by fish (redtail splitfin, Xenotoca eiseni). Animal Cognition 16 (2):307–312.

Twyman, A. D., Newcombe, N. S., and Gould, T. J. 2012. Malleability in the development of spatial reorientation. Developmental Psychobiology 55 (3):243–255.

Vallortigara, G., Pagni, P., and Sovrano, V. A. 2004. Separate geometric and non-geometric modules for spatial reorientation: evidence from a lopsided animal brain. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 16:390–400.

Vallortigara, G., Sovrano, V. A., and Chiandetti, C. 2009. Doing Socrates experiment right: controlled rearing studies of geometrical knowledge in animals. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 19 (1):20–26.

Wystrach, A., and Beugnon, G. 2009. Ants learn geometry and features. Current Biology 19:61–66.
How to Cite
Sovrano, V. A., & Chiandetti, C. (2017). Reorientation ability in redtail splitfin (<em>Xenotoca eiseni</em&gt;): role of environmental shape, rearing in group and exposure time. Biological Communications, 62(1), 48–56.
Full communications