Species distribution modeling of the Caspian whipsnake <em>Dolichophis caspius</em> (Squamata: Serpentes): a tool for ranking conservation priorities in the Western Pontic steppe

Vladimir Tytar; Oksana Nekrasova

doi:10.21638/11701/spbu03.2016.324

Authors

Vladimir Tytar Schmalhausen Institute of Zoology NAS of Ukraine, 15, vul. B. Khmel’nytskogo, Kyiv, 01601, Ukraine
Oksana Nekrasova Schmalhausen Institute of Zoology NAS of Ukraine, 15, vul. B. Khmel’nytskogo, Kyiv, 01601, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu03.2016.324

Abstract

A prediction (Maxent) has been made of the potential distribution of the Caspian whipsnake (Dolichophis caspius) within the Western Pontic steppe (exemplified by Ukraine and the Crimea) for conservation purposes. Ranking has been accomplished of conservation priorities amongst administrative units in the area with the view of alerting local government officials and nature conservation practitoners on the species and tracking consequences of climate change. Refs 21. Figs 1. Tables 2.

Keywords:

Dolichophis caspius, Serpentes, Western Pontic steppe, species distribution modeling, nature conservation, ranking conservation priorities

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Sindaco R., Venchi A., Grieco C. The Reptiles of the Western Palearctic, Volume 2: Annotated Checklist and Distributional Atlas of the Snakes of Europe, North Africa, Middle East and Central Asia. Latina, Edizioni Belvedere, 2013. 544 p.

Covaciu-Marcov S.-D., David A. Dolichophis caspius (Serpentes: Colubridae) in Romania: New distribution records from the northern limit of its range. Turkish Journal of Zoology, 2010, vol. 34, pp. 119–121.

Red Data book of Ukraine. Animals. Ed. by I. A. Akimov. Кyiv, 2009. 600 p. Available at: http://redbookua.org/ru (accessed 13.05.2016).

Red Data Book of the Russian Federation (animals). RAN Vol. I. Danilov-Danilyan, etc. Moscow, AST Publ., Astrel’ Publ., 2001. 862 p. Available at: https://www.mnr.gov.ru/upload/iblock/7ce/krasnaja_kniga%20givotnie1.zip (accessed 13.05.2016).

Research Fronts. 100 Top Ranked Specialties in the Sciences and Social Sciences. Compiled by Thompson Reuters in cooperation with the National Science Laboratory, Chinese Academy of Sciences (NSCL). Annual report. 2014. 62 p.

Phillips S. J., Anderson R. P., Schapire R. E. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecological Modeling, 2006, vol. 190, no. 3–4, pp. 231–259.

Elith J., Graham C. H., Anderson, R. P. et al. Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence data. Ecography, 2006, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 129–151.

Duan R. Y., Kong X. Q., Huang M. Y. et al. The predictive performance and stability of six species distribution models. PLoS One, 2014, Nov. 10, vol. 9, No. 11, pp. e112764.

Sahlean T. C., Gherghel I., Papeş M., Strugariu A., Zamfirescu Ş. R. Refining Climate Change Projections for Organisms with Low Dispersal Abilities: A Case Study of the Caspian Whip Snake. 2014. PLoS ONE 9(3): e91994.

Dotsenko I. B. Catalogue of collections of the Zoological Museum of the NSNHM, NAS of Ukraine. The Snakes. Kiev, NSNHM, 2003. 86 p.

Biliakov I. V., Tarashchuk S. V. For distribution in North-West black sea region of some species of snakes that are under special protection in Ukraine. Registration of animals under Red Data Book of Ukraine. Ed. by A. V. Kostiushin. Кiev, 2008, pp. 9–16.

Kotenko T. I., Kurjachii K. V. Finds of reptilian species that are proposed for inclusion in III edition of Red Data Book of Ukraine, in Donetsk oblast — Ukrainian. Registration of animals under Red Data Book of Ukraine. Ed. by A. V. Kostiushin, Kiev, 2008, pp. 152–170.

Verbruggen H., Tyberghein L., Belton G. S. et al. Improving transferability of introduced species’ distribution models: new tools to forecast the spread of a highly invasive seaweed. PLoS One, 2013. 8: e68337.

Hijmans R. J., Cameron S. E., Parra J. L. et al. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology, 2005, vol. 25, no. 15, pp. 1965–1978.

Swets K. Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science, 1988, vol. 240, pp. 1285–1293.

Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS), and Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN). Columbia University. Last of the Wild Project, Version 2, 2005 (LWP-2): Global Human Footprint Dataset (Geographic). 2005. NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC), Palisades, New York. Available at: http://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/data/set/wildareas-v2-human-footprint-geographic (accessed 18.03.2015).

Owen J. G., Dixon J. R. An ecogeographic analysis of the herpetofauna of Texas. Southwestern Naturalist, 1989, vol. 34, no.2, pp. 165–180.

Ward R., Zimmerman E. G., King T. L. Environmental correlates to terrestrial reptilian distributions in Texas. Texas Journal of Science, 1994, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 21–26.

Elith J., Phillips S. J., Hastie T. et al. A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists. Diversity and Distributions, 2011, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 43–57.

Parmesan C., Yohe G. A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature, 2003, vol. 421, no. 6918, pp. 37–42.

Baldwin R. A. Use of maximum entropy modeling in wildlife research. Entropy, 2009, vol. 11, no. 4. P. 854–866.